Shady Characters

Welcome to the 2025 Shady Characters advent calendar! I’ll be counting down to Christmas by way of ten of the most interesting, controversial, and downright odd emoji to have appeared on our screens. Enjoy, and come back every other day or so for a new entry!

Every now and again an emoji appears that makes the reader say “What is this? Why is it here? Who thought this was a good idea?” It is in the spirit of both asking and answering such questions that I give you ‘🕴️’, or PERSON IN SUIT LEVITATING.

The story of how ‘🕴️’ ended up in our smartphones will not be a novel one for readers who have been following this year’s Shady Characters advent calendar, although it is still worth telling. What may be less obvious is why an emoji of a levitating person in a business suit should exist in the first place.

Just as Unicode was created from a collection of older character sets, and just as emoji were adopted from Japan’s mobile phones1 and television sets,2 so other groups of characters are added to the Unicode standard from time to time. One of those sets, which debuted in 2014,3 came from a typeface called Webdings, which itself had been created by Microsoft all the way back in 1997.4 And Webdings, finally, was the birthplace of ‘🕴️’ — or rather, of a sober black-and-white version of the same symbol, because both Webdings and PERSON IN SUIT LEVITATING were artefacts of a monochrome, pre-emoji world.*

A Microsoft web page explains the company’s rationale for commissioning a new dingbat font:

Webdings is ideal for enriching the appearance of a Web page. Because it’s a font, it can be installed on the user’s system, (or embedded in the document itself) is fully scaleable and quick to render. It’s a perfect way of including graphics on your site without making users wait for lots of graphic files to download.4

This is almost exactly the same logic that led Shigetaka Kurita, emoji’s one-time founding father, to mint his emoji as a font rather than as individual images.5 Webdings never took off in computer-based writing in the way emoji have done for smartphones, but it’s not a stretch to say that the two had a lot in common.

Webdings’s eclectic collection of symbols† was a mix of iconic and symbolic, generic and specific. There were play/pause symbols; globes, maps and animals; planes, train, and automobiles. And then there was this guy: ‘🕴️’.

Webdings’ characters were drawn by Sue Lightfoot, Ian Patterson and Geraldine Wade of Monotype, the type foundry, and also by Vincent Connare of Microsoft itself. Connare, who had previously designed Comic Sans (yes, that Comic Sans), recounted for Newsweek in 2016 that a symbol labelled “jump” had caught his eye in Webdings’ list of prospective characters.

Connare connected some dots. He was a fan of lively, exuberant ska music, whose devotees often sported sharp suits, pencil ties and pork-pie hats, and Connare decided that “jump” would be best exemplified by a pogoing figure wearing those same clothes. He modelled his design on the logo of a record label called 2 Tone, which took the form of a louche, smiling figure clad in ska’s trademark uniform. 2 Tone, in turn, had based that logo on a 1965 photograph of a reggae musician named Peter Tosh. And so, not only does PERSON IN SUIT LEVITATING predate emoji, but it is one of the few — only? — emoji that can draw a line of descent back to a real person.6,7

No-one would argue that ‘🕴️’ has the reach of ‘😂’ or the usefulness of ‘✨’. Nor is it even clear what it means. Dasha Fayvinova of Bustle, who lays claim to the one (semi-)serious attempt to define the meaning of PERSON IN SUIT LEVITATING, places it on an extremely fuzzy spectrum which runs from “grumpy” to “fan of Quentin Tarantino’s opus, Pulp Fiction”.8 (Wisely, Emojipedia demurs on the matter.9) We are left, then, with one of the great emoji curiosities: a symbol that exists not because we need it, or because it serves some greater purpose, but mostly because it can.

Thanks for reading! If you’d like to learn more about emoji, take a look at my latest book, Face with Tears of Joy: A Natural History of Emoji, available now from all good bookshops.

1.

Scherer, Markus, Mark Davis, Kat Momoi, Darick Tong, Yasuo Kida, and Peter Edberg. “L2/10-132:/Emoji/Symbols:/Background/Data”. Unicode Consortium, April 2010.

 ↢

2.

Suignard, Michel. “L2/08-077R2:/Japanese/TV/Symbols”. Unicode Consortium, March 11, 2008.

 ↢

3.

Unicode. “Unicode 7.0.0”.

 ↢

4.

Microsoft Typography. “Webdings font family”. Accessed November 18, 2025.

 ↢

5.

Mariko Kosaka Power of Emoji. Ffconf 2016. Brighton, 2016.

 ↢

6.

Veix, Joe. “The Secret Ska History of a Little-Used Emoji”. Newsweek.

 ↢

7.

2 Tone Records. “The 2 Tone Label”. Accessed November 21, 2025.

 ↢

8.

Fayvinova, Dasha. “What Does Man In Business Suit Levitating Emoji Mean?”. Bustle.

 ↢

9.

Emojipedia. “🕴️ Person in Suit Levitating Emoji”. Accessed November 21, 2025.

 ↢

*

Unfortunately, some web browsers don’t do a great job handling characters which can be displayed both in colour and and black and white. For the moment, you’ll have to picture a monochrome version of this guy: ‘🕴️’! ↢

†

You can see Webding’s full set of symbols over at Wikipedia. ↢

Welcome to the 2025 Shady Characters advent calendar! I’ll be counting down to Christmas by way of ten of the most interesting, controversial, and downright odd emoji to have appeared on our screens. Enjoy, and come back every other day or so for a new entry!

If you spend even a modest proportion of your time online, you have almost certainly come across the SPARKLES emoji (✨). It’s a cheery and versatile symbol, and it is increasing found outside emoji’s usual habitat of text messages and social networks. Of late, in fact, SPARKLES has taken on a new gig that promises to significantly boost its profile, if not its popularity: ‘✨’ is now closely associated with that most divisive of technologies, AI.

Per Emojipedia, the SPARKLES emoji rode high throughout 2020 as the third most common emoji on Twitter after only ‘😂’ and ‘😭’. Keith Broni, Emojipedia’s editor-in-chief, attributed the emoji’s popularity to a rise in its use as a ✨whimsical✨, ✨magical✨ or ✨ironic✨ marker. Broni drew a comparison between this general pattern and the use of italics for the same purposes.1

Yet this temporary spike in popularity (‘✨’ was trending downwards by the end of 2020) was surely not enough to explain what happened next. As reported by Jazper Lu in the Wall Street Journal, in 2021 an “AI marketing” company named Jasper used the SPARKLES emoji in a marketing video — and from there, if indeed that was ground zero for the AI-sparkles fad, the practice spread like an airborne pathogen.2 By 2023, with a new wave of AI hype fuelled by a novel class of machine-learning algorithms called “transformers”, Spotify, Google, Zoom and OpenAI were all using ‘✨’ as a signifier for anything and everything connected to AI.3

Why did these titans of the tech world converge on ‘✨’? Lest you be deceived into imagining that the great and the good of the tech industry are any different to the rest of us, the answer is this: they couldn’t think of anything better. Lu cited “design and marketing executives” who claimed they had chosen the symbol simply because everyone else seemed to be making the same choice.2 This isn’t necessarily a bad reason — after all, if our various different computing devices employ conventions such as ‘🔍’ to mean “search”, or ‘💾’ for “save”, they are that much easier to use — but it doesn’t exactly speak to an industry which has scaled the heights of inspiration.

Groupthink aside, I do wonder if there is another reason for SPARKLES’ adoption as an AI mascot, and a ironic reason at that.

The basic properties of an emoji, such as its name, appearance, and numeric code point, are open to all. Although the Unicode Consortium claims copyright in its specifications, website, and other documents,4 it is nevertheless free and legal to build a computer system or typeface that makes use of Unicode’s work. Indeed, the internet of today would not work without Unicode’s accommodating approach to intellectual property: too many web pages and emails would arrive on our screens with unintelligible text and broken characters.

My thesis, then, is that the SPARKLES emoji’s lack of legal encumbrance makes it a tempting and low-risk choice. Google can use ‘✨’ to mean “AI”; Facebook can use ‘✨’ to mean “AI”; Microsoft can use ‘✨’ to mean “AI”; and they need not — indeed, cannot — waste each other’s time or money arguing in court over who owns it. I have no idea whether this is true or not (appropriately enough, Google’s Gemini chatbot didn’t know either), but it seems fitting that a legally charmed icon should become the symbol of a technology built on a foundation of voracious copyright infringement.

Thanks for reading! If you’d like to learn more about emoji, take a look at my latest book, Face with Tears of Joy: A Natural History of Emoji, available now from all good bookshops.

1.

Broni, Keith. “It’s Not Just You. The Sparkles Emoji Is ✨Everywhere✨”. Emojipedia (blog).

 ↢

2.

Lu, Jazper. “How the Sparkles Emoji Became the Symbol of Our AI Future”. Wall Street Journal, sec. Tech.

 ↢

3.

Cheng, Michelle. “How ✨ Became the Unofficial AI Emoji”. Quartz.

 ↢

4.

“Unicode Terms of Use”. Accessed November 9, 2025.

 ↢

Welcome to the 2025 Shady Characters advent calendar! I’ll be counting down to Christmas by way of ten of the most interesting, controversial, and downright odd emoji to have appeared on our screens. Enjoy, and come back every other day or so for a new entry!

If the onsen emoji (♨️) and the hamburger (🍔) show us the nuts and bolts of how emoji work, THUMBS UP (👍) shows us how we, emoji’s users, put our own stamp on them. That’s because ‘👍’ is a chameleon and a provocateur, with meanings that can vary widely depending on how old you are and where you use it.

Like many of the most common emoji, THUMBS UP was inherited from Japan’s competing emoji sets and was standardised only in 2010.1,2 Yet unlike many of its peers, ‘👍’ had a non-emoji counterpart right from the start.

Facebook’s “like” button was that counterpart, an innocuous user-interface control which debuted in February 2009, and which which was normally rendered as a blue-tinted thumbs-up gesture.3 The company had been working on a “like” button since 2007,4 and, although emoji at the time were still mostly confined to Japan, many in the tech industry knew of emoji and were working on them in one capacity or another. It’s tempting to speculate, if not to state definitively, that Facebook’s thumbs-up button could easily have been inspired by the ‘👍’ which would soon make it way into the world at large.

There’s a lot to be said about the “like” button itself (and indeed, a lot has been said about it5,6,7,8), but in the interest of getting to the point, I’d like to look specifically at what it has done to the ‘👍’ emoji. Because with fifteen years of both “like” buttons and emoji under our belts, making use of the prima facie simple THUMBS UP emoji has become anything but straightforward.

With the caveat that this is my own personal opinion, it seems plain that the “like” buttons which litter social media and messaging applications, most of which ape Facebook’s simple thumbs-up, have cheapened the corresponding emoji. (A slew of recent opinion pieces seem to agree: “The unbearable rudeness of the thumbs up emoji”;9 “Thumbs up to the season of ambivalence”10 “Gen Z Have Cancelled The Thumbs Up Emoji And Here’s Why You Should Worry”11.) By making it trivially easy to acknowledge a message with a cursory ‘👍’, the ubiquity of the “like” button has cursed its emoji counterpart with a significant gravitas shortfall.

The result is that in 2025, the ‘👍’ survives mostly within environments that are inhospitable to irony. Corporate chat systems such as Microsoft Teams are one; earnest social networks popular with older people, such as Facebook, are another. In places such as these, a ‘👍’ conveys a meaning close to its real-world inspiration: yes, I will attend your meeting. Yes, I like your pictures from Disneyland Paris. But in other contexts, a ‘👍’ is not a good thing. It is the calling card of a desperately outmoded correspondent,12 or a symbol of assent so blasé as to shoot straight past agreement and hit passive aggression instead. Sure. Whatever.9

Like ‘😂’, ‘👍’ is a convincing data point in the ongoing argument over whether we should think of emoji as a language: they can certainly be as confusing, as contradictory, and as elusive as any word.

Thanks for reading! If you’d like to learn more about emoji, take a look at my latest book, Face with Tears of Joy: A Natural History of Emoji, available now from all good bookshops.

1.

Scherer, Markus, Mark Davis, Kat Momoi, Darick Tong, Yasuo Kida, and Peter Edberg. “L2/10-132:/Emoji/Symbols:/Background/Data”. Unicode Consortium, April 2010.

 ↢

2.

The Unicode Standard, Version 6.0 - Archived Code Charts. Mountain View: The Unicode Consortium, 2010.

 ↢

3.

Pearlman, Leah. “I Like This”. Facebook Note. Facebook.

 ↢

4.

Unknown entry ↢

5.

Roosendaal, Arnold. “Facebook Tracks and Traces Everyone: Like This!”. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, November 30, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1717563.

 ↢

6.

Levordashka, Ana, Sonja Utz, and Renee Ambros. “What’s in a Like? Motivations for Pressing the Like Button”. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 10, no. 1 (2016): 623-626. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14768.

 ↢

7.

Chin, Chih-Yu, Hsi-Peng Lu, and Chao-Ming Wu. “Facebook Users’ Motivation for Clicking the ‘Like’ Button”. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 43, no. 4 (May 24, 2015): 579-592. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.4.579.

 ↢

8.

Eranti, Veikko, and Markku Lonkila. “The Social Significance of the Facebook Like Button”. First Monday, May 28, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i6.5505.

 ↢

9.

Strimpel, Zoe. “The unbearable rudeness of the thumbs up emoji”. The Spectator (blog).

 ↢

10.

King, Jack. “Thumbs up to the season of ambivalence”. British GQ.

 ↢

11.

Brandon, John. “Gen Z Have Cancelled The Thumbs Up Emoji And Here’s Why You Should Worry”. Forbes. Accessed November 7, 2025.

 ↢

12.

Hampson, Laura. “These emojis make you look ’old’ to Gen Z, according to new poll - Yahoo Life UK”. Yahoo! Life.

 ↢

Welcome to the 2025 Shady Characters advent calendar! I’ll be counting down to Christmas by way of ten of the most interesting, controversial, and downright odd emoji to have appeared on our screens. Enjoy, and come back every other day or so for a new entry!

In most ways, the HAMBURGER emoji is quite boring. It’s been around since emoji’s Japanese heyday, when it appeared on phones from all of Japan’s big cellphone networks, and it was one of the first emoji to be adopted for use in the wider world.1 Early documents show that ‘🍔’ was intended to represent both hamburgers specifically (ハンバーガー, or hanbaagaa) and fast food in general (ファーストフード, or fuaasutofuudo)2 — although its modest place in the emoji rankings, coming in at only 355th most popular in 2021,3 suggests that neither sense is particularly compelling. To put it another way, and to see emoji’s very long tail in action, HAMBURGER is used 677 times less often than ‘😂’, the most common emoji.

Why, then, am I writing about ‘🍔’? Well, for two reasons.

First is because HAMBURGER provides an object lesson in how emoji are not really standardised, at least not in the way you might expect. Back in 2017, when Google refreshed the visual appearance of all its emoji, the slice of cheese on the ‘🍔’ somehow migrated from its rightful position atop the burger to under it,4 prompting not a little online surprise.5 Google CEO Sundar Pichai, who, it should be noted, earned $200,000,000 that same year,6 publicly promised to fix the position of the cheese on a pixelated hamburger:

Will drop everything else we are doing and address on Monday:) if folks can agree on the correct way to do this!

And indeed, Pichai was as good as his word. The cheese was soon restored.7

That “burgergate” had come about at all was because neither Google nor anyone else truly controls what emoji look like. The Unicode Consortium, which gives each emoji its unique name and number, provides examples of how each one should be designed, but it has no way to enforce those suggestions. This is why Facebook’s emoji can look subtly different to Microsoft’s, and Microsoft’s to Snapchat’s, and so on. And furthermore, this is why Google, the first big Western company to embrace emoji, can put the cheese in the wrong place in the ‘🍔’.

The second reason to take note of the burger emoji is because its mid-table position in the emoji hierarchy has a practical significance. The set of emoji we can use on our phones and computers isn’t fixed. The same Unicode Consortium which manages the emoji lexicon invites proposals for new symbols, and each year, a lucky few are given the official seal of approval. One of the criteria for deciding which new emoji to approve is their expected level of usage — and that is where HAMBURGER comes in. Although its popularity is little more than a rounding error when compared to the most common emoji, ‘🍔’ sits roughly at the midpoint, or median, of emoji popularity: about half of all emoji are more popular, and about half are less popular.8 HAMBURGER is a helpful, beefy barometer for how popular an emoji needs to be before Unicode’s emoji subcommittee will take it into consideration.

The humble ‘🍔’ has a lot to teach us about how emoji work.

Thanks for reading! If you’d like to learn more about emoji, take a look at my latest book, Face with Tears of Joy: A Natural History of Emoji, available now from all good bookshops.

1.

Unicode. “Unicode 6.0.0”.

 ↢

2.

Scherer, Markus, Mark Davis, Kat Momoi, Darick Tong, Yasuo Kida, and Peter Edberg. “L2/10-132:/Emoji/Symbols:/Background/Data”. Unicode Consortium, April 2010.

 ↢

3.

Daniel, Jennifer. “Emoji Frequency”. Unicode.

 ↢

4.

Felt, Doug. “Update Svgs to New Design. · Googlefonts Noto-emoji@f931bea”. GitHub.

 ↢

5.

“I Think We Need to Have a Discussion about How Google’s Burger Emoji Is Placing the Cheese Underneath the Burger, While Apple Puts It on Top Https: t.Co PgXmCkY3Yc”. Tweet. Twitter.

 ↢

6.

Shinal, John. “Google CEO Sundar Pichai Doubled His Pay Last Year to $200 Million”. CNBC.

 ↢

7.

Ricker, Thomas. “Google CEO Makes Fixing Hamburger Emoji His Top Priority”. The Verge.

 ↢

8.

Davis, Mark. “L2/19-082:/QID/Emoji/Proposal”. Unicode Consortium, March 28, 2019.

 ↢